Description

C-terminal-binding protein [Source:VB External Description;Acc:AGAP003893]

Location
About this transcript

This transcript has 7 exons, is annotated with 13 domains and features, is associated with 13 variations and maps to 25 oligo probes.

Gene

This transcript is a product of gene AGAP003893 Show transcript tableHide transcript table

NameTranscript IDbpProteinTranslation IDBiotypeUniProtRefSeqFlags
NovelAGAP003893-RC2200473aaAGAP003893-PC
 
Protein coding
F5HIX2 XM_003436603.1
XM_003436604.1
XM_003436605.1
XM_003436606.1
XM_308121.5
XP_003436651.1
XP_003436652.1
XP_003436653.1
XP_003436654.1
XP_308121.5
NovelAGAP003893-RD2169473aaAGAP003893-PD
 
Protein coding
F5HIX2 XM_003436603.1
XM_003436604.1
XM_003436605.1
XM_003436606.1
XM_308121.5
XP_003436651.1
XP_003436652.1
XP_003436653.1
XP_003436654.1
XP_308121.5
NovelAGAP003893-RE2116473aaAGAP003893-PE
 
Protein coding
F5HIX2 XM_003436603.1
XM_003436604.1
XM_003436605.1
XM_003436606.1
XM_308121.5
XP_003436651.1
XP_003436652.1
XP_003436653.1
XP_003436654.1
XP_308121.5
NovelAGAP003893-RB2073473aaAGAP003893-PB
 
Protein coding
F5HIX2 XM_003436603.1
XM_003436604.1
XM_003436605.1
XM_003436606.1
XM_308121.5
XP_003436651.1
XP_003436652.1
XP_003436653.1
XP_003436654.1
XP_308121.5
NovelAGAP003893-RA2012473aaAGAP003893-PA
 
Protein coding
F5HIX2 XM_003436603.1
XM_003436604.1
XM_003436605.1
XM_003436606.1
XM_308121.5
XP_003436651.1
XP_003436652.1
XP_003436653.1
XP_003436654.1
XP_308121.5
Statistics

Exons: 7, Coding exons: 6, Transcript length: 2,116 bps, Translation length: 473 residues

Version

AGAP003893-RE.

Type

Known protein coding

Annotation Method

Genes were annotated by merging Ensembl and TIGR prediction sets. The Ensembl automatic analysis pipeline used either a GeneWise/Exonerate model from a known protein or a set of aligned cDNAs/ESTs followed by an ORF prediction. GeneWise/Exonerate models are further combined with available aligned cDNAs/ESTs to annotate UTRs (for more information see V.Curwen et al., Genome Res. 2004 14:942-50). TIGR annotations were based on Augustus (M. Stanke), GlimmerHMM (M. Pertea), Genie (D. Kulp), and Twinscan (M. Brent) gene predictions, coupled with protein and EST genome alignments.

Transcript-based displays